Slideshow image

 

Victoria Cobb, President

Monday, February 9, 2026

 

During a House Education Committee meeting, Delegate Dan Helmer (D-Fairfax) claimed that HB 359 “essentially maintain[s] the status quo in Virginia,” suggesting the bill would not meaningfully alter private education policy.

 

Be careful of the left hand while watching what the right hand is doing.

 

 

Delegate Helmer and the Virginia Education Association (VEA), which helped draft HB 359, repeatedly asserted that the bill is narrowly focused on schools participating in the federal scholarship tax credit program if Virginia remains a participating state. That claim is demonstrably false.

 

Both the introduced bill and the committee substitute define “public funds” broadly to include tuition assistance derived from state and federal vouchers, education savings accounts, tax credits and deductions, or “other arrangements.” This language is intentionally expansive and would apply far beyond any single federal program, sweeping in future state and federal tuition assistance initiatives that do not yet exist.

 

The House Education Committee approved a substitute that includes a narrow carve-out for the existing Education Improvement Scholarships Tax Credit (EISTC) program. While that change is welcome, it does not fix the bill’s fundamental flaws. The bill remains deeply problematic and now advances to a House Appropriations subcommittee on elementary and secondary education due to its fiscal impact, but it could also be heard in the full committee this week.

 

HB 359 represents a direct assault on private education, rivaling regulatory efforts seen in states like California. It establishes a dangerous framework that subjects private schools to sweeping state control if they enroll even one student receiving tuition assistance, whether through a federal program, any future state program, or any other public subsidy. 

 

This threat is not hypothetical. If new federal or state tuition assistance programs are created, HB 359 ensures that private schools would immediately be subjected to public-school mandates as a condition of participation. The predictable result is that many private schools will opt out entirely.

 

As a result, only wealthy families will be able to afford private education, while low-income and working-class families, the very families educational choice is meant to serve, will be shut out. So much for affordability!

 

In practice, HB 359 forces private schools into an impossible choice: abandon their mission, independence, and religious identity, or stop serving families who rely on educational assistance.

 

 

The bill also raises serious constitutional concerns. During the committee hearing, our policy team, and reiterated by Del. Tom Garrett (R), explained that in Trinity Lutheran v. ComerEspinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue, and Carson v. Makin, the U.S. Supreme Court made clear that states may not discriminate against religious schools as a condition of participation in generally available public benefit programs.

 

This bill clearly crosses that constitutional "red-line" by conditioning access to tuition assistance on the surrender of religious character, governance, and practice.

 

HB 359 is not about accountability or preserving the “status quo.” It is about control over families, faith-based education, and the future of educational choice in Virginia.

 

Donate

 

Share this email with your friends by clicking an icon below!

 

Facebook

YouTube

Instagram

Twitter

 

The Family Foundation

familyfoundation.org
(804) 343-0010 | 
vafamily@familyfoundation.org


Leave a comment

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

We reserve the right to remove any comments deemed inappropriate.